<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: School students’ cars can be searched in NJ…</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sailelaw.com/blog/school-students%e2%80%99-cars-can-be-searched-in-nj%e2%80%a6/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sailelaw.com/blog/school-students%e2%80%99-cars-can-be-searched-in-nj%e2%80%a6</link>
	<description>PA - NJ Car Accident Injury Lawyer Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.sailelaw.com/blog/school-students%e2%80%99-cars-can-be-searched-in-nj%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1#comment-24924</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sailelaw.com/blog/?p=418#comment-24924</guid>
		<description>ok, so now, the law and ruling stands, ..... what is prevention the attorney general of nj, .. who wants to run for governor i might add, .. from going to the meadowlands facilty, and bringing gun dogs in, the go througth the footrball giants practice parking lot, searching for handguns? .... in other words, i am for the law, ... and the law says that non registered - non permitted handguns, can not ne in a vehicle in new jersey, ... let alone on state property, in the possession of private citizens, ....

as you may or may not know, antonio pierce, of the ny football giants, . upon his team mate shootiong himself at a nyc niteclub a few weeks ago, . placed buress and the glock 40 caliber handgun in his vehicle, and drove them into the state of nj, .... 

what does the law mean if it is not going to be upheld?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, so now, the law and ruling stands, &#8230;.. what is prevention the attorney general of nj, .. who wants to run for governor i might add, .. from going to the meadowlands facilty, and bringing gun dogs in, the go througth the footrball giants practice parking lot, searching for handguns? &#8230;. in other words, i am for the law, &#8230; and the law says that non registered &#8211; non permitted handguns, can not ne in a vehicle in new jersey, &#8230; let alone on state property, in the possession of private citizens, &#8230;.</p>
<p>as you may or may not know, antonio pierce, of the ny football giants, . upon his team mate shootiong himself at a nyc niteclub a few weeks ago, . placed buress and the glock 40 caliber handgun in his vehicle, and drove them into the state of nj, &#8230;. </p>
<p>what does the law mean if it is not going to be upheld?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.sailelaw.com/blog/school-students%e2%80%99-cars-can-be-searched-in-nj%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1#comment-23312</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sailelaw.com/blog/?p=418#comment-23312</guid>
		<description>is this a published case?, or wil it be officially published by the courts, ..... in my review of court cases, in my limited understanding, unpublished cases are not precident, ......

i hope this goes to the nj supreme court, and even a pro se person could argue this, .. it is a No brainer, ... of course THEY NEED A SEARCH WARRANT, ..... 

WHAT KIND OF LAW ARE WE BREEDING WITH THIS TYPE OD DECISION, ... if published, trhis gives every public school principal the right to search every car on the lot, .. with all he having to do is make up some kind of bull reason, .... without rreal reason, ...

this is why we have judges, warrants, and proble cause, abd the us contitutiuon,/;..///</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is this a published case?, or wil it be officially published by the courts, &#8230;.. in my review of court cases, in my limited understanding, unpublished cases are not precident, &#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>i hope this goes to the nj supreme court, and even a pro se person could argue this, .. it is a No brainer, &#8230; of course THEY NEED A SEARCH WARRANT, &#8230;.. </p>
<p>WHAT KIND OF LAW ARE WE BREEDING WITH THIS TYPE OD DECISION, &#8230; if published, trhis gives every public school principal the right to search every car on the lot, .. with all he having to do is make up some kind of bull reason, &#8230;. without rreal reason, &#8230;</p>
<p>this is why we have judges, warrants, and proble cause, abd the us contitutiuon,/;..///</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.sailelaw.com/blog/school-students%e2%80%99-cars-can-be-searched-in-nj%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1#comment-23308</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sailelaw.com/blog/?p=418#comment-23308</guid>
		<description>opps, my last post for harassment was meant for a totally different website...

getting back to the issue, are not public school administratorts agents for that State?, do these people not receive pensions from the State?

having principals and vice principals , and guidance counselors , search cars on the schools lot, in lieu of the police, yet acting as agents of the Statre, is a civil rights violation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>opps, my last post for harassment was meant for a totally different website&#8230;</p>
<p>getting back to the issue, are not public school administratorts agents for that State?, do these people not receive pensions from the State?</p>
<p>having principals and vice principals , and guidance counselors , search cars on the schools lot, in lieu of the police, yet acting as agents of the Statre, is a civil rights violation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.sailelaw.com/blog/school-students%e2%80%99-cars-can-be-searched-in-nj%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1#comment-23305</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sailelaw.com/blog/?p=418#comment-23305</guid>
		<description>i do not like the decision.   this means at any time, a non law enforcement officer can enter students cars at random, .....while class is going on,...... and say he found drugs there, with no police presence or warrant.

what exactly is the purpose of the constitution, if not to protect people from searches like this,...... from false allegations, ..... from retaliation,....?

nj courts continue to make up the law as they go, ......

again, would it have been so bad to call the judge in the town, during a regular working weekday hours , and get a warrant first, and have the police search the car?

to me , that is more reasonable than for a principal to search a students car when the student was not in or near the car,....

this has got to be overturened by the nj supreme court, .....

the attorney must argue in full zealous in protection of the most basic and fundamental constitutional rights...

to me, the only reasonable search of the car by the principal would have been if he had information weapons were in the car and threats were made.

searching for drugs in students cars is not a life and death immediate situation, and should have been handled by the police with a warrant, ..... who knows, the judge may not have signed the warrant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i do not like the decision.   this means at any time, a non law enforcement officer can enter students cars at random, &#8230;..while class is going on,&#8230;&#8230; and say he found drugs there, with no police presence or warrant.</p>
<p>what exactly is the purpose of the constitution, if not to protect people from searches like this,&#8230;&#8230; from false allegations, &#8230;.. from retaliation,&#8230;.?</p>
<p>nj courts continue to make up the law as they go, &#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>again, would it have been so bad to call the judge in the town, during a regular working weekday hours , and get a warrant first, and have the police search the car?</p>
<p>to me , that is more reasonable than for a principal to search a students car when the student was not in or near the car,&#8230;.</p>
<p>this has got to be overturened by the nj supreme court, &#8230;..</p>
<p>the attorney must argue in full zealous in protection of the most basic and fundamental constitutional rights&#8230;</p>
<p>to me, the only reasonable search of the car by the principal would have been if he had information weapons were in the car and threats were made.</p>
<p>searching for drugs in students cars is not a life and death immediate situation, and should have been handled by the police with a warrant, &#8230;.. who knows, the judge may not have signed the warrant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.sailelaw.com/blog/school-students%e2%80%99-cars-can-be-searched-in-nj%e2%80%a6/comment-page-1#comment-23301</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sailelaw.com/blog/?p=418#comment-23301</guid>
		<description>this search will be thrown out. What court ruled that a search can be done without a warrant? would it have been so hard to get a warrant? certainly if the court is saying there was reasonable suspicion to search the car, certainly the police could have obtained a warrant. why didnt they? how do we know the school administrator didn&#039;t plant drugs in the car, or simply say he found it in the car? 

there are reasons for the bill of rights and 14th amendment. 

the police should have been called and the police should have obtained a warrant.

any reasonable person would have to say what was found in the car is suspicious and should be thrown out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this search will be thrown out. What court ruled that a search can be done without a warrant? would it have been so hard to get a warrant? certainly if the court is saying there was reasonable suspicion to search the car, certainly the police could have obtained a warrant. why didnt they? how do we know the school administrator didn&#8217;t plant drugs in the car, or simply say he found it in the car? </p>
<p>there are reasons for the bill of rights and 14th amendment. </p>
<p>the police should have been called and the police should have obtained a warrant.</p>
<p>any reasonable person would have to say what was found in the car is suspicious and should be thrown out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

